Tuesday, March 01, 2005

The New York Times Editorial Page Finally Admits Change Is Occuring In The Middle East

I am still reeling over this editorial from today's New York Times. When I read the 1st 2 paragraphs to my wife, she commented on how "pragmatic" FOXNews.com had become. When I revealed that what I had just read her was the editorial page from the NYT, she nearly spit her coffee out in total surprise. I will share with you now the paragraphs I read to her this morning:

It's not even spring yet, but a long-frozen political order seems to be cracking all over the Middle East. Cautious hopes for something new and better are stirring along the Tigris and the Nile, the elegant boulevards of Beirut, and the impoverished towns of the Gaza Strip. It is far too soon for any certainties about ultimate outcomes. In Iraq, a brutal insurgency still competes for headlines with post-election democratic maneuvering. Yesterday a suicide bomber plowed into a crowd of Iraqi police and Army recruits, killing at least 122 people - the largest death toll in a single such bombing since the American invasion nearly two years ago. And the Palestinian terrorists who blew up a Tel Aviv nightclub last Friday underscored the continuing fragility of what has now been almost two months of steady political and diplomatic progress between Israelis and Palestinians.

Still, this has so far been a year of heartening surprises - each one remarkable in itself, and taken together truly astonishing. The Bush administration is entitled to claim a healthy share of the credit for many of these advances. It boldly proclaimed the cause of Middle East democracy at a time when few in the West thought it had any realistic chance. And for all the negative consequences that flowed from the American invasion of Iraq, there could have been no democratic elections there this January if Saddam Hussein had still been in power. Washington's challenge now lies in finding ways to nurture and encourage these still fragile trends without smothering them in a triumphalist embrace.

The rest of the editorial follows the same pattern and it is (I can't believe I am about to say this about an NYT editorial) very much worth the read.



0 comments: